Posts Tagged ‘vitamin d research’

Ryan says thanks to J.K Rowling

Saturday, September 4th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

me n ryanI would like to record my personal gratitude to Jo Rowling for the massive donation to research, and also thank her for the ongoing support of  the Shine on Scotland campaign.

The incredible donation recently announced will effect everyone with MS but it means much more to my own family than just the MS research.

The new Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic will research other diseases and hopefully move towards finding a cure for Motor Neurone, a disease that has effected my family deeply and personally.

My great grandfather John Moore was the first person to be diagnosed with the disease in Scotland.  And only 2 years ago we lost my mum’s uncle who had both Motor Neurone and Parkinson’s which is very rare .

When my own mum took i’ll we feared that it was Motor Neurone and i’ll never forget the fear that I felt. I can only hope this investments in Scotlands health will yield great results and lead to future treatments to improve the outcome.

The previous investments made by Jo into research at the Edingburgh research center is already getting results.

‘I believe the investment puts Scotland firmly at the front of research into finding the cure for MS ‘

This has been in no small part due to the involvement of Jo Rowling

I have renewed hope for what the future holds for my mum and that a cure will be found for her and all the suffers living with these diseases.

Thank you from my family.

Ryan Mclaughlin

In Memorium: Frank Garland, PhD -

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

In Memorium : Frank Garland, PhD

Frank Garland Phd

His studies shed light on link between Vitamin D and Cancer


UC San Diego Professor of Family and Preventive Medicine, Frank Garland, PhD, died Tuesday, August 17 in La Jolla, California, after a year-long battle with illness. Garland was also Technical Director of the Naval Health Research Center.


A San Diego native, Garland was born on June 20, 1950. He received his PhD degree in epidemiology from the Johns Hopkins University and began a distinguished career in vitamin D research for cancer and disease prevention.


“Frank Garland’s untimely death is a great loss to this division where he has been a superb teacher of epidemiologic research methods in general, and the potential benefits of Vitamin D in particular,” said Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD, professor and chief of the Division of Epidemiology in the UCSD Department of Family and Preventive Medicine. “His studies and research by many other scientists now suggest that Vitamin D not only prevents some common cancers, but also reduces the risk of other common diseases. Frank will be missed as a scholar, mentor, and friend.”


Garland’s brother and co-investigator, Cedric Garland, PhD, professor of family and preventive medicine at UC San Diego said their interest in vitamin D began in July 1974. “We had just driven cross-country to attend a seminar in Baltimore. On the very first day, some cancer mortality rate maps were shared. We both immediately noticed a pattern; a pattern that launched both our careers.Our entire academic lives are based on that single moment.”


At that seminar, the Garland brothers noticed that the mortality rate maps of breast and colon cancer were twice as high in many counties of the northern tier of states than in the southwest. These geographic differences led to their theory that vitamin D and calcium were preventing adenocarcinoma of the colon and breast in the sunnier parts of the United States.


This theory broke away from the conventional belief that sunlight was a dangerous cause of skin cancer which should be completely avoided.


The Garland’s theory, first published in 1980 in the International Journal of Epidemiology, proposed that vitamin D and calcium are capable of preventing cancer, setting the course for a three-decade-long career devoted to vitamin D research.


“Over the past three decades, the Garlands’ seminal hypothesis has been largely confirmed by numerous additional studies,” said Edward Giovannucci, MD, ScD, professor of nutrition and epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health. “Improving vitamin D status remains one of the most promising natural ways to combat incidence and death from some cancers.”


Frank Garland’s descriptive study of sunlight and cancer mortality initiated two well-known studies published by members of the Garland team and other colleagues in the medical journal The Lancet. The first study was a 19-year historical cohort study in Chicago which found that people whose vitamin D and/or calcium intakes were in the top fifth of the population had half the incidence of colon cancer as those in the bottom fifth. This was the first study to find an effect of oral intake of vitamin D or calcium on cancer risk.


The second key paper by Garland and his colleagues analyzed vitamin D concentrations in volunteers in Washington County, Maryland. This cohort study collected blood from 25,000 volunteers and showed for the first time that people with high concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the serum had very low risk of colon cancer.


These Garland papers are cited in more than 95 percent of other vitamin D-related papers. The papers have led to major advances in the understanding of the role of vitamin D in cancer prevention including its role in prevention of cancer of the ovary, kidney, bladder and endometrium.


In 2006, the International Journal of Epidemiology re-published Garland’s 1980 article concerning vitamin D and cancer mortality based on his geographic observations. The republication was followed by a set of scientific commentaries on the importance of this seminal research.


“Frank’s devotion to the pursuit of scientific truth about vitamin D and realization of its potential benefit to humanity is a major factor in the emergence of vitamin D as an increasingly accepted tool for reducing incidence rates of cancer, and more recently, Type 1diabetes in children,” said Cedric Garland.


In addition to his brother, Cedric, Garland is survived by his mother, Eva Caldwell Garagliano, also of San Diego.

Giving babies sunshine vitamin may cut illness risk

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized


By Lyndsay Moss

Health Correspondent – The Scotsman

TAKING vitamin D during pregnancy and in the first few years of life could help reduce the risk of a wide ranges of illness, researchers have revealed, after finding new genetic links between diseases and the compound.

The latest study mapped how the so-called “sunshine vitamin” interacted with human DNA, finding more than 200 genes where it had a direct influence.

The results suggest that taking supplements in early life could help reduce the risk of several illnesses multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease and some types of cancer.

ryanmclaughlin

It is estimated that one billion people worldwide do not have enough vitamin D, the main source of which comes through exposure to sunlight.

Scotland has some of the highest rates of MS in the world, and this has been linked by some to the lack of sunlight.

Glasgow schoolboy Ryan McLaughlin, whose mother Kirsten has MS, launched a campaign to increase awareness of the importance of vitamin D supplements with a petition at the Scottish Parliament last year.

A poor diet can also lead to vitamin D deficiency, according to the study published in Genome Research.

Previous studies have suggested that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of “autoimmune conditions” such as MS and rheumatoid arthritis.

Now researchers at Oxford University have shown the true extent to which vitamin D interacts with our DNA, potentially making it a factor in a whole host of diseases.

The researchers used new DNA sequencing technology to create a map of vitamin D “receptor binding” across the genome – our complete genetic make-up.

The vitamin D receptor is a protein activated by vitamin D, which attaches itself to DNA and so influences what proteins are made from our genetic code. The researchers found 2,776 “binding sites” for the vitamin D receptor along the genome.

These were concentrated near genes associated with susceptibility to conditions such as MS, Crohn’s disease, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, and to cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and colorectal cancer.

They also showed that vitamin D had a significant effect on the activity of 229 genes, including IRF8, previously associated with MS, and PTPN2, associated with Crohn’s disease and type 1 diabetes.

Dr Andreas Heger, from the Medical Research Council Functional Genomics Unit at Oxford, said: “Our study shows quite dramatically the wide-ranging influence that vitamin D exerts over our health.”

Professor George Ebers, senior researcher on the study, said the evidence for the link between vitamin D and some illnesses, such as MS and Type 1 diabetes, had already been found.

But he said before the latest study, the evidence linking vitamin D to lupus and colon cancer had not been so strong.

There could also be other illnesses linked to vitamin D deficiency which are not yet known about.

Dr Sreeram Ramagopalan, from the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, said: “There is now evidence supporting a role for vitamin D in susceptibility to a host of diseases.

“Vitamin D supplements during pregnancy and the early years could have a beneficial effect on a child’s health in later life.

“Some countries such as France have instituted this as a routine public health measure.”

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Giving-babies-sunshine-vitamin-may.6490474.jp?articlepage=1

Some evidence vitamin D might fight colds

Saturday, August 7th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in External News Articles, Uncategorized

By Amy Norton

NEW YORKThu Aug 5, 2010 12:56pm EDT


A daily vitamin D supplement may help young men enjoy more sick-free days during cold and flu season, a small study suggests.

Vitamin D has been the subject of much research of late, with studies linking low vitamin D levels in the blood to higher risks of type 1 diabetes and severe asthma attacks in children and, in adults, heart disease, certain cancers and depression.

But whether vitamin D is the reason for the excess risks — and whether taking supplements can curb those risks — has yet to be shown.

The body naturally synthesizes vitamin D when the skin is exposed to sunlight. Because rates of vitamin D insufficiency rise during the winter in many parts of the world, researchers have been interested in whether the vitamin might play a role in people’s susceptibility to colds, flu and other respiratory infections.

Some past research has indeed found that people with relatively lower vitamin D levels in their blood tend to have higher rates of respiratory infections than those with higher levels of the vitamin, said Dr. Ilkka Laaksi of the University of Tampere in Finland, the lead researcher on the new study.

Along with that evidence, recent lab research has shown that vitamin D may play an “important role” in the body’s immune defenses against respiratory pathogens, Laaksi wrote in an email to Reuters Health.

“However,” the researcher said, “there is a lack of clinical studies of the effect of vitamin D supplementation for preventing respiratory infections.”

For the current study, Laaksi’s team randomly assigned 164 male military recruits to take either 400 international units (IU) of vitamin D or inactive placebo pills every day for six months — from October to March, covering the months when people’s vitamin D stores typically decline and when respiratory infections typically peak.

At the end of the study, the researchers found no clear difference between the two groups in the average number of days missed from duty due to a respiratory infection — which included bronchitis, sinus infections, pneumonia, ear infections and sore throat.

On average, men who took vitamin D missed about two days from duty because of a respiratory infection, compared with three days in the placebo group. That difference was not significant in statistical terms.

However, men in the vitamin D group were more likely to have no days missed from work due to a respiratory illness.

Overall, 51 percent remained “healthy” throughout the six-month study, versus 36 percent of the placebo group, the researchers report.

The findings, Laaksi said, offer “some evidence” of a benefit from vitamin D against respiratory infections.

Still, the extent of the benefit was not clear. While recruits in the vitamin group were more likely to have no days missed from duty, they were no less likely to report having cold-like symptoms at some point during the study period.

Moreover, recent studies on the usefulness of vitamin D for warding off respiratory ills have come to conflicting conclusions.

A study of Japanese schoolchildren published earlier this year found that those given 1,200 IU of vitamin D each day during cold and flu season were less likely to contract influenza A. Of 167 children given the supplement, 18 developed the flu, compared with 31 of 167 children given placebo pills.

On the other hand, a recent study of 162 adults found that those who took 2,000 IU of vitamin D everyday for 12 weeks were no less likely to develop respiratory infections than those given placebo pills.

Laaksi said that larger clinical trials looking at different doses of vitamin D are still needed before the vitamin can be recommended for curbing the risk of respiratory infections.

In the U.S., health officials recommend that adults up to the age of 50 get 200 IU of vitamin D each day, while older adults should get 400 to 600 IU. The upper limit is currently set at 2,000 IU per day; higher intakes may raise the risks of side effects.

Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity are often vague and include nausea, vomiting, constipation, poor appetite and weight loss. Excessive vitamin D in the blood can also raise blood pressure or trigger heart rhythm abnormalities.

Some researchers believe that people need more vitamin D than is currently recommended, and that intakes above 2,000 IU per day are safe. However, exactly what the optimal vitamin D intake might be remains under debate.

Food sources of vitamin D include milk, breakfast cereals and orange juice fortified with vitamin D, as well as some fatty fish, like salmon and mackerel. Experts generally recommend vitamin pills for people who do not get enough of the vitamin from food.

SOURCE: link.reuters.com/dan53n Journal of Infectious Diseases, online July 15, 2010

Scottish Vitamin D Summit Captures International Attention

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Scottish Vitamin D Summit Captures International Attention

For immediate release : July 21st 2010

Shine on Scotland campaigners and the MS Society Scotland held productive talks with the Scottish Government yesterday as planning continues for the Scottish Summit on Vitamin D and MS which will take place in Glasgow in September.

Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing Nicola Sturgeon will open the event at which international researchers and scientists will be present to discuss the latest research on vitamin D and the implications for public health policy in Scotland.

In recent weeks more researchers from as far afield as Australia have confirmed their attendance at the summit.  International media organisations have also expressed an interest in the event which looks set to be high profile.

Looking ahead to September, Ryan McLaughlin said:

“It’s incredibly exciting that it’s now so close.  A lot of work has gone into the campaign and hopefully this summit will make a real difference.  The Scottish Government and Parliament have been very supportive of the campaign and it’s great to have reached this stage”.

Craig Wilkie, Head of Policy and Communications at MS Society Scotland also attended the meeting at St Andrews House:

“The Summit is a great opportunity to bring internationally renowned researchers to Scotland to discuss a hugely important public health issue.  The focus will be a practical one in terms of public health policy and we have the chance to learn lessons from other countries and make a significant contribution to the health of the nation”.

More than half the world’s population gets insufficient vitamin D, says UCR biochemist

Sunday, July 18th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Contact: Iqbal Pittalwala
iqbal@ucr.edu
951-827-6050
University of California – Riverside

RIVERSIDE, Calif. – Vitamin D surfaces as a news topic every few months. How much daily vitamin D should a person get? Is it possible to have too much of it? Is exposure to the sun, which is the body’s natural way of producing vitamin D, the best option? Or do supplements suffice?

In the July 2010 issue of Endocrine Today, a monthly newspaper published by SLACK, Inc., to disseminate information about diabetes and endocrine disorders, Anthony Norman, a distinguished professor emeritus of biochemistry and biomedical sciences and an international expert on vitamin D, notes that half the people in North America and Western Europe get insufficient amounts of vitamin D.

Anthony Norman is a distinguished professor of biochemistry and biomedical sciences (emeritus) at UC Riverside, and an international expert on vitamin D.

Anthony Norman is a distinguished professor of biochemistry and biomedical sciences (emeritus) at UC Riverside, and an international expert on vitamin D.

“Elsewhere, it is worse,” he says, “given that two-thirds of the people are vitamin D-insufficient or deficient. It is clear that merely eating vitamin D-rich foods is not adequate to solve the problem for most adults.”

Currently, the recommended daily intake of vitamin D is 200 international units (IU) for people up to 50 years old; 400 IU for people 51 to 70 years old; and 600 IU for people over 70 years old.

“There is a wide consensus among scientists that the relative daily intake of vitamin D should be increased to 2,000 to 4,000 IU for most adults,” Norman says. “A 2000 IU daily intake can be achieved by a combination of sunshine, food, supplements, and possibly even limited tanning exposure.”

While there is now abundant data on vitamin D and its benefits, Norman believes there is room for more study.

“The benefits of more research on the topic justifies why this field of research deserves additional governmental funding,” he says. “Already, several studies have reported substantial reductions in incidence of breast cancer, colon cancer and type 1 diabetes in association with adequate intake of vitamin D, the positive effect generally occurring within five years of initiation of adequate vitamin D intake.”

Because vitamin D is found in very few foods naturally (e.g. fish, eggs and cod liver oil) other foods such as milk, orange juice, some yogurts and some breakfast foods are fortified with it. The fortification levels aim at about 400 IU per day.

Norman, who holds the title of Presidential Chair in Biochemistry-Emeritus, has been researching vitamin D for nearly 50 years. In 1967, his laboratory discovered that the vitamin is converted into a steroid hormone by the body. Two years later, his laboratory discovered the vitamin D receptor (or VDR), an essential receptor for the steroid hormone form of vitamin D that is present in more than 37 target organs of the body that respond biologically to the vitamin.

“There is now irrevocable evidence that receptors in the immune, pancreas, heart-cardiovascular, muscle and brain systems in the body generate biological responses to the steroid hormone form of vitamin D,” he says.


Supplements beat sun for vitamin D boost: Study

Sunday, June 27th, 2010 | Tags: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

By Stephen Daniells, 18-Jun-2010

Adequate vitamin D levels are best achieved by supplements because of the side-effects of UV exposure, says the results of a new computer simulation model from the US.

We can produce vitamin D in our skin on exposure to sunlight, but the merits of getting the supplement via sunlight or supplements is a source of ongoing debate.

In the US, where over 1.5 million people are diagnosed with skin cancer every year, experts are pushing supplements, claiming recommendations for sun exposure are “highly irresponsible”.

Computer science

Scientists from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York and the Norwegian Institute for Air Research in Tromsø used a computer model to determine optimal sun exposure times to produce blood levels of vitamin D3 equivalent to 400 or 1000 IU of vitamin D.

The researcher chose two geographical sites – Miami, FL, and Boston, MA – for their simulation and selected four months – January, April, July, and October.

Data showed that in summer in Boston, people would need between three and eight minutes of sunlight exposure to about 25 per cent of their body surface to synthesise 400 IU of vitamin D. In winter, the simulation indicated that it would be difficult to produce any vitamin D in Boston. No such problems were calculated in Miami, however, with between three and six minutes needed to produce 400 IU at all times of the year.

“There are many limitations to these models, and clearly the estimates are only rough approximations,” said the researchers. “Although it may be tempting to recommend intentional sun exposure for a few minutes several times a week, cutaneous vitamin D synthesis is an intricate process and depends on numerous variables.

“Even in a simplified model such as the one used here, it can be seen to vary considerably by geography, season, and skin type. Furthermore, even if a more accurate and practical model were developed, titrating one’s own exposure to sunlight is difficult, if not impossible.

“Because of these practical difficulties combined with the detrimental side effects of UV exposure, we endorse the IARC assessment that even if it is ultimately demonstrated that increasing vitamin D levels impacts cancer and chronic disease, oral supplements of vitamin D would probably represent the safest way to increase vitamin D status,” concluded the researchers.

D details

Vitamin D refers to two biologically inactive precursors – D3, also known as cholecalciferol, and D2, also known as ergocalciferol. Both D3 and D2 precursors are hydroxylated in the liver and kidneys to form 25- hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the non-active ’storage’ form, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), the biologically active form that is tightly controlled by the body.

An ever growing body of science supports the benefits of maintaining healthy vitamin D levels. In adults, it is said vitamin D deficiency may precipitate or exacerbate osteopenia, osteoporosis, muscle weakness, fractures, common cancers, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases and cardiovascular diseases. There is also some evidence that the vitamin may reduce the incidence of several types of cancer and type-1 diabetes.

Source: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
June 2010, Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 929.e1-929.e9
“Estimated equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation across seasons at two US latitudes”
Authors: V. Terushkin, A. Bender, E.L. Psaty, O. Engelsen, S.Q. Wang, A.C. Halpern

Genetic factors affect risk of Vitamin D insufficency

Sunday, June 13th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Press release from Great Ormond Street Hospital

With thanks to The Lancet

A new study published online first, and in an upcoming Lancet, shows that genetic factors affect the risk of a person having vitamin D insufficiency. The article is written by Prof Tim Spector, King’s College, London, London, UK, Dr Elina Hyppönen, UCL Institute of Child Health , London, UK, and Dr Thomas J Wang, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA, and international colleagues from the SUNLIGHT consortium.

Vitamin D is crucial for maintenance of musculoskeletal health, and might also have a role in extraskeletal tissues. Determinants of circulating vitamin D concentrations include sun exposure and diet, but previous work showing clustering of low vitamin D concentrations within families and twins suggests that genetic factors also play a part. In this study, the authors aimed to identify common genetic variants affecting vitamin D concentrations and risk of insufficiency.
The authors did a genome-wide association study of almost 34,000 white people of European descent from 15 studies. A range of conventional techniques, including radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry, were used to determine serum vitamin D concentrations. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as concentrations lower than 75 nmol/L or 50 nmol/L.

Variants at three genetic sites or ‘loci’ were significantly associated with vitamin D concentrations. These loci were near genes involved in cholesterol synthesis, vitamin D metabolism, and vitamin D transport. Participants with a genotype score (combining the three confirmed variants) in the highest quartile (the 25% at greatest risk) were at two-and-a-half times increased risk of having vitamin D concentrations lower than 75 nmol compared with those in the lowest quartile (The 25% at lowest risk).

The authors conclude: “Our findings establish a role for common genetic variants in regulation of circulating vitamin D concentrations. The presence of harmful alleles at the three confirmed loci more than doubled the risk of vitamin D insufficiency. These findings improve our understanding of vitamin D regulation and could assist identification of a subgroup of the white population who are most at risk of vitamin D insufficiency and who may need extra levels of supplementation.*”

They add:  “We studied only white individuals of European descent. Whether the genetic variants we identified affect vitamin D status in other racial or ethnic groups is unknown and warrants further study.”

In an accompanying comment, Dr Roger Bouillon, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, says: “Today’s results only partly explain the wide variability of vitamin D status, and whether these genetically based variations modify the health outcomes in vitamin D deficiency is not known. Therefore the battle against vitamin D deficiency will probably not be modified by these new findings. We need additional studies to explain the mechanisms underlying the pandemic of vitamin D deficiency and, above all, we need a strategy to correct this serious worldwide deficiency.”

http://press.thelancet.com/vitamind.pdf

Notes to editors:

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust is the country’s leading centre for treating sick children, with the widest range of specialists under one roof.

With the UCL Institute of Child Health, we are the largest centre for paediatric research outside the US and play a key role in training children’s health specialists for the future.

Our charity needs to raise £50 million every year to help rebuild and refurbish Great Ormond Street Hospital, buy vital equipment and fund pioneering research. With your help we provide world class care to our very ill children and their families.

Sunny Climate Kids Low in Vitamin D

Friday, June 11th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

AUGUSTA, Ga.—Even kids in sunny climates aren’t getting enough vitamin D, according to a study from the Georgia Prevention Institute (Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1104-11). Researchers there, along with researchers from the Medical College of Georgia and Boston University, found low vitamin D status is prevalent among adolescents living in a year-round sunny climate, particularly among black youths. They also found low levels of vitamin D levels in kids was linked to increased fat, decreased physical activity and lower fitness levels.

The objectives of the study were to characterize the vitamin D status of black and white adolescents residing in the southeastern United States (latitude: 33°N) and to investigate relationships with adiposity.

Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy for 559 adolescents 14 to 18 years of age (45 percent black and 49 percent female). Fat tissues, physical activity and cardiovascular fitness also were measured.

The overall prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (<75 nmol/L) and deficiency (50 nmol/L) were 56.4 percent and 28.8 percent, respectively. Black versus white subjects had significantly lower plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in every season (winter, 35.9 ± 2.5 vs 77.4 ± 2.7 nmol/L; spring, 46.4 ± 3.5 vs 101.3 ± 3.5 nmol/L; summer, 50.7 ± 4.0 vs 104.3 ± 4.0 nmol/L; autumn, 54.4 ± 4.0 vs 96.8 ± 2.7 nmol/L).

With adjustment for age, gender, race, season, height and sexual maturation, significant inverse correlations occurred between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and all adiposity measurements, including BMI percentile (P = .02), waist circumference (P < .01), total fat mass (P < .01), percentage of body fat (P < .01), visceral adipose tissue (P = .015) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (P = .039).

The researchers found significant positive associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and vigorous physical activity (P < .01) and cardiovascular fitness (P = .025).